Royal Blush

Royal Blush – new book, coming out in a month or so

Well, Royal Blush is about Prince William meeting a refugee girl on Skype. He doesn’t use skype in his name, of course, so she has no idea who she’s talking to.

Sometime into the conversation, she realises something isn’t quite normal with the guy. He drops ‘hints’ as if he wants her to know, but doesn’t want to tell her. Like he enjoys being a mystery.

For her, first big clue was that they spoke about him being outside, using skype and how dogs sense ‘nice people’ even on line. The next day there was an article about PW using his phone while hunting. There was a picture of him standing outside, phone in one hand and his dog standing patiently by his side. This was beginning to 2007. Not many people had a phone that could have skype on it.

But, the girl thought that must be a coincidence. She carried on using skype, refusing to even wonder if she could be talking to PW. Conversations were highly flirtatious. But then, why not. It’s just a bit of fun, right?

Next clue was when she told him she went to Asda. Next day, PW was in Asda for the first and only time in his life. Still she refused to believe it.

The next big clue came when she told him she’d never consider dating a guy who has a girlfriend. Newspapers reported him and Kate braking up – later on we’ll learn it was just a fake break-up, didn’t last even a week.

The girl also had a visit from a William-look-alike, who claimed he was a fireman checking alarms in the area.

The girl refuses to acknowledge fully that it could be PW, until he says so. However, he refused to say so. Instead, he kept asking her to marry him. What a joke, right? Asking a girl whom you haven’t told your name to marry you. Surely, no one in the world would be stupid enough to see that as something serious. Eventually, in November 2007, just to see what will happen, she says yes to his marriage proposal. The next day his relationship with Kate became public again, she didn’t hear from him again.

Well, that was to be expected, right? It’s not like he meant any of the messages he sent. It was just a bit of fun.

It would have been just a bit of fun if it were not for the fact that behind her back PW sent an army of dimwits who interfered in her life preventing her to live just by hacking into her e-mails and doing as they pleased.

In 2008 the girl just wanted to get rid of them. Having learned that their version of fun is really messed up and evil, she just didn’t want anything to do with them.

2009 they were still there, still interfering in her life as if she was a nothing, less than an object. She tried to explain that she a refugee and that to her getting a job and getting on with her life is vital. They were not moved. They carried on.

She had nowhere to turn. Large part of her life had already been destroyed. She could just sit back and wait for them to get bored and leave her alone.

She stopped all communication on line. But it was no use.

2017 they are still at it. It’s no longer just part of her life that’s destroyed, it’s her whole being.

They remain unmoved, unharmed, carrying on as if she was a nothing. Why? How could someone in their right mind, let alone a Royal, stoop that low? Could it be that they really believe in some hocus-pocus? Some legends? Psychics? And if they did believe that this girl had something special, surely after destroying her they should realise they’ve destroyed that? And even if they hadn’t completely taken everything from her, should they believe that she would ever consider having them in her life in any shape or form?

Who are the real Windsors? Could they be a bunch of lunatics who believe in some supernatural so much, that there is nothing natural about them, that they know nothing about reality? 

LGBT and the Church

So, the Bible is against same sex sex. And, well, let’s just call a spade a spade, love doesn’t make people gay, sex makes people gay. Church is also against promiscuous behaviour. As far as theology is concerned, being gay is a step further than being promiscuous.

Now, would we ask the church to bless sex outside marriage? I don’t think we would. Clearly society in general approves of it, but would we ask the church to bless it since it blesses dogs and cats? No! Dogs and cats are creatures, not behaviour. Behaviour is one thing, creatures are another. Two very different things. Let’s not compare the two because the reports that rest on an argument like this are just hollow.

Church isn’t suggesting gay people should be punished or banished or anything like that. It simply states that it cannot bless such behaviour since it goes against its teachings. So why are we applying pressure on the church to change its beliefs and teachings? Isn’t that asking for too much? 

‘Lady’ and the Trump

So May hurried to see president Trump.

I’m a helpless optimist so I was like “Cool, maybe she’ll make him see sense.” Boy! Turns out there’s a fine line between ‘optimist’ and ‘down-right-stupid’. This realisation has made me fearful. At one point I thought “Thank goodness we didn’t turn a blind eye to Hitler. Just look how much we have learned from that monster’s mistakes. We are really looking out for Hitler-like behaviour and standing against it.” When I first thought this, I was sure that would be enough to avoid another holocaust. But is that conclusion a voice of an optimist or an idiot? What if I refuse to be an idiot? If I were to sit down and think of ways to make sure we avoid bloodshed, or any further bloodshed (too much blood is being spilled to hope for no bloodshed), I’d say we have to talk more. We have to be persistent and love humans. There will be individuals who’ll abuse this state and try to turn us away from believing that killing innocent people is wrong. I would warn against listening to those who claim that a whole group is ‘not innocent’ because someone who claimed to belong to that group has done something bad. We have to stop assuming we are smart and work at being smart, I don’t think our first thought is necessarily the right one. I mean, Germans were smart. They were just like anyone else. How did Hitler talk them into doing things that they are really not inclined to do? We have to learn from their mistakes also. And it’s not just them. Milosevic managed to turn perfectly decent Serbs into monsters. So on and so forth. The point is, each individual matters, and each person will notice something. At a time like this, I think we would do better to listen to one another.

Let’s look at Brexit for just a moment. It was the most rushed referendum I had ever seen. The rules were hardly decided. Conclusion is that: ‘People have spoken’ – who are the people? Most were silent. Most didn’t vote one way or another. Is it because they don’t care? Or perhaps they didn’t feel they have enough information to cast a valid, educated vote and they didn’t want to guess? Perhaps they were certain that UK would vote stay so why bother voting? – it is not uncommon that those wanting a change are far more passionate than those who want things to remain the same, and passion means you will make the effort. Anyhow, ‘people have spoken’ is an unrealistic statement. Did anyone ever say that if you are a citizen of the UK and you don’t go out to vote, you will be assumed as if you have taken yourself out of the UK and you will not be counted? While this may seem obvious to some, it is unknown to many. Many people did not realise that if they don’t vote it’ll be as if they don’t exist. And then… Many people are only now learning about what the EU means. Only now they are discovering the truth about Human Rights. Now! When it is too late! And why is that? Is it because the information is much clearer and ‘louder’ now that the voice of the opposition has been silent? Or perhaps it is because now people are more likely to believe it, open their mind, instead of thinking that you are only saying that to ‘make’ them vote a certain way? No one can make you do anything. But you should choose to think about everything you hear and ask for more information if you are not sure.

Speaking of ‘people have spoken’. Who does president Trump represent? It is not the people but the system of the USA. With all due respect, I do not care for the system in America. If American people said they wanted to change it now, I’d say ‘So long as it is better for you guys, go for it’. But people!? People matter. To me, the system should be there to serve the people. Anyone who is unwilling to work with a president elected by the people is free to resign. Not to mention that it seems a voice in one state is worth more than a voice in another state. And it seems to be about how populated that state is. What?! Take a moment to think about what that is? Of course there are nut-jobs in America. America is a large country. If every family had just one person who is a nut (and every family has at least one of those all around the world), that’s a lot of nuts. I was not surprised to listen to a woman support president Trump because her son was killed in a car accident and the other driver was Mexican, so she thinks roads in America would be safer is there were no Mexicans in America. But if we hand out justice like that, we’d all be in jail. I heard the woman. I am so sorry for her tragic loss. But, she needs a good therapist not a position of power.

Having said all that, ‘every cloud has a silver lining’. I watched lawyers in America rush to airports to help, free of charge. Perhaps a Trump was needed to wake up citizens of America so that they too take their country back. America has been falling for quite some time. Well, the fact is, it rose when the world was drowning, Europe was literally in ashes. It is not that much of a challenge to rise at a time like that. The times have changed. We have learned a lot. America has to make some changes and I think only people of America know what and how. Perhaps this ‘a Trump’ was needed to wake them up into action?

As for us… As a Bosnian I’ll have to write a whole new blog – we still have a ‘war’ going on since the ‘brilliant’ administration of Clinton decided that Dayton was a document worth considering let alone signing. But, as a Brit… well, there is much that can be said there too, however I’d like to mention this ‘state visit’. May kind of jumped the gun, went too far with that one, in my opinion. It does feel like she has overstepped the boundary. Imagine you live with people and one of your roommates decides to invite a person who is a personification of everything you dislike. Other roommates agree with you, they also don’t want a visit from that person. Imagine they tell that person that they are not welcome. If the person had any honour they would refuse to come and have a private chat with the one who rushed such an invitation. But let’s see what president Trump will do? Will president Trump show us more than anything what modern politics is really all about? It is something masses need to see. Or perhaps president Trump will prove himself, show us that we were wrong and that he’s only guilty of inability to articulate his true thoughts. And then we will change our minds and welcome him with ‘open arms’ – as I said: Optimist or lunatic? What am I?